Hey, fintech fam! π
Iβm writing to you from the Amtrak quiet car as I head back to New York from Washington, D.C., where I had the honor of speaking on Capitol Hill about why women must be shaping blockchain policy.
Having Fintech Is Femme and our community represented in that room mattered. Blockchain doesnβt need more billionaires positioning themselves as visionaries. It needs women β the ones building, governing, and solving actual economic problems β at the table where the rules for the next generation of finance are written.
Standing there, even for a moment, felt like a reminder of how far weβve come β and how much further weβre about to go.
Now Iβm headed back to New York because tomorrow weβre hosting the official launch of The Trust Club, a new Humans of Fintech mini-series presented by Middesk.
Make sure youβre subscribed to the Fintech Is Femme YouTube channel so you donβt miss an episode, and follow me on LinkedIn and Instagram β weβre about to roll out a whole wave of new content, behind-the-scenes moments, and the conversations youβve been asking for.
For the first episode, my guests and I are fully styled in pieces from our venue partner Rag & Bone. Because fintech can be nerdy, but here β weβre proving it can also be cool, cultural, and editorially stylish.
Because if weβre going to continue shaping the culture β from Capitol Hill to catwalk energy β then we should also look and feel like the future weβre building: intentional, bold, inclusive, and fun.
Letβs get into it.
INNOVATION
Fintech Wants Speed. Consumers Want Safety. Consumer Reports Says Itβs Time to Crash-Test the System.

Delicia Hand of Consumer Reports (left) speaks on a panel at Punchbowl News.
Thereβs a specific kind of quiet that hits when you think your money just vanished.
Mine arrived last year on an otherwise normal afternoon, when a fraud alert pinged my phone. A supposedly βurgentβ withdrawal notice from my account. Within seconds, panic set in. I froze my card. I dialed customer service. I braced for impact.
Then came⦠nothing.
No follow-up.
No timeline.
No clarity.
Just silence.
The fraud turned out to be fake β a phishing attempt. But the feeling was real: a sudden, sharp loss of trust in a financial system Iβve spent a decade covering and championing.
A massive fintech neobank I trusted had left me alone, vanishing at the exact moment I needed them β no follow-up, no explanation, just a vacuum. And in that gap, something essential broke.
And if someone like me β a journalist who reports on fintech daily β could lose confidence that quickly, what does that say about the millions of people trying to manage their money with the tools weβre all building?
Itβs a question thatβs becoming impossible to ignore across the industry. And itβs the question at the center of a new initiative from Consumer Reports, the 88-year-old nonprofit known for crash-testing cars, rating appliances, and defining what βsafeβ means for millions of American households.
Now, CR is crash-testing fintech.
The same way they crash-test SUVs, baby car seats, and kitchen appliances.
And honestly?
Itβs long overdue.
Because in 2025 we would never:
β Drive a car that hadnβt been crash-tested.
β Plug in an appliance that hadnβt passed a safety inspection.
β Put a baby in a stroller without impact-testing standards.
So why do we treat fintech β the technology that holds our savings, paychecks, benefits, funding, and identities β with less rigor?
At Money20/20 in Las Vegas, I sat down with three Consumer Reports leaders who are stepping directly into that void with their Fairness by Design Playbook, a blueprint for building financial products that are safe, transparent, equitable, and trustworthy by design:
Delicia Hand, Senior Director of Digital Marketplace at CR and former CFPB official who helped shape federal consumer protections.
Johnny Mathias, Director of Corporate Strategy & Engagement, who helps companies operationalize CRβs standards.
Evan Feeney, Associate Director of Corporate Engagement, responsible for taking CRβs product testing into the real-world trenches of fintech.
Together, theyβre trying to bring something to fintech that it has never truly had:
Independent crash testing before products scale.
Fintech Skipped Road Testing. Consumers Paid the Price.
When CR first began evaluating P2P apps in 2022, they flagged issues that seemed minor at the time β inconsistent disclosure practices, confusing language, and missing clarity around FDIC insurance.
βPeople asked why FDIC clarity mattered in a P2P app,β Hand told me. βThen 2023 happened.β
Five banks failed in a matter of months.
$50 billion in uninsured deposits evaporated.
Fintech users didnβt know whether their money was protected β or where it even lived.
Hand continued:
βFintech enters the market without road testing,β she said. βWhen you skip that stage, the harms can be catastrophic.β
Not βunfortunate.β
Not βsuboptimal UX.β
Catastrophic.
CR saw it coming because they test fintech the way they test cars: Drive it fast. Push it hard.
Simulate the failure before it affects real people.
Where does the app break? What happens during fraud? How clear is the off-ramp?
How fast does money move when things go wrong?
And most damningly: Does the product protect consumers under stress β not just in ideal scenarios?
Fintechβs answer, so far, has largely been: no.
The Playbook: Fairness as Infrastructure
CRβs Fairness by Design Playbook lays out six principles that fintech companies should design around from day one:
Safety
Privacy
Transparency
User Centricity
Financial Well-Being
Inclusivity
Unlike most industry frameworks, this one is not vibes and values. Itβs:
β Product behaviors
β Metrics
β Tests
β Policies
β Evidence
β Real-world use cases
βDigital finance moves too fast for a reactive model,β Feeney explained. βIf we want a fair ecosystem, we need guidelines companies can use proactively, not after harm has occurred.β
This is foundational β because fintechβs biggest vulnerability is not the tech itself.
Itβs trust.
Fintech Used to Build So People Would Come. Now It Must Build So People Stay
Hand offered what may become the defining insight of fintechβs next chapter:
βFintech used to build so people would come. Now you need to build so people will stay.β
Think about that shift.
The last 10 years of fintech were dominated by:
Acquisition
Growth hacks
Slick onboarding
Cash incentives
UX gymnastics
But today?
Retention is the real battleground.
And trust is the strategy.
Consumers are:
financially anxious
exhausted by fraud
wary of data-sharing
quick to abandon financial providers
more informed than ever (thanks to AI and comparison tools)
Trust has become a competitive differentiator β one the industry has not been crash-testing for.
Transparency: The Failure Mode Everyone Underestimates
When I asked which principle fintech struggles with most, Hand didnβt hesitate:
βDisclosure is no longer an effective consumer protection tool.β
We all know this is true.
No one reads 27-page terms.
Consumers click βagreeβ just to get to payday.
And in the most critical moments β during fraud, fees, account holds β the information that matters most is often buried, missing, or incomprehensible.
βConsumers deserve better than 3.5 point font on a five-inch screen,β Hand said.
Transparency is not paperwork. Transparency is design.
It looks like:
clearly marked off-ramps
plain-language alerts
clear timelines
expectations not buried in legalese
Privacy: The Most Underused Growth Strategy in Fintech
Johnny Mathias has reviewed dozens of fintech privacy policies, and he sees the same pattern:
βPrivacy is treated as a compliance exercise instead of a relationship builder,β he said.
In one product review, CR found a company giving itself permission to record audio from the userβs device.
Why?
Leftover legal language.
No real purpose.
A trust-killer hiding in plain sight.
When CR flagged it, the company removed it β immediately.
A tiny fix with massive trust implications.
Mathias emphasized:
βUsers will share their data if you tell them exactly what youβre doing and mean what you say.β
The companies that win the privacy era wonβt be those who collect the most data β but those who collect the least with greater intentionality.Β
Financial Wellness: Fintechβs Biggest Gap Between Marketing and Reality
Every fintech claims to βimprove financial well-being.β
Very few measure it.
Feeney broke down the gap:
βThereβs a difference between marketing financial well-being and actually supporting it,β he said. βCompanies arenβt tracking whether peopleβs lives are improving.β
CR wants companies to measure:
financial health indicators
vulnerability scores
the impact of nudges
whether consumers are making better decisions over time
And most importantly:
Donβt upsell credit when someone is financially unstable.
Common sense. Rare practice.
Fraud: The New Consumer Experience β and the Perfect Crash Test
Fraud is no longer a one-off event.
Itβs a constant drumbeat (these days, my morning alarm is just a chorus of βScam Likelyβ calls).
Growing faster than fintech itself.
Feeney described the emotional impact:
βFraud feels like a personal failure. Companies can either repair that moment β or deepen the wound.β
In my case, they deepened the wound.
A false alarm phishing attempt resulted in:
a frozen account
zero communication
zero reassurance
me abandoning the neobank altogether
That wasnβt a fraud loss.
That was a trust loss.
CR believes fraud workflows should include:
toggle controls to pause new transactions
protections that still allow recurring payments
real timelines
human-centered communication
Imagine if, instead of a panic spiral and two-hour hold, I had been able to tap a button labeled:
βPause new activity β keep bills running β Iβll call support.β
It seems small.
But thatβs the difference between a crash test failure and a survivable bump.
Fintech Needs Crash Tests Because Money Is a Safety Issue
This is the core argument the industry has been avoiding:
Fintech products are safety-critical. They determine whether people can eat, pay rent, or avoid financial collapse.
Cars can kill bodies.
Fintech can kill stability.
Both deserve testing.
CR is the first organization to say it out loud:
If fintech is going to be infrastructure, it must be crash-tested like infrastructure.
Just listen to Hand:
βConsumers now have tools to evaluate institutions themselves. The bar is rising. Companies must rise with it.β
Or Feeney:
βAny product we evaluate today could be different tomorrow. Thatβs why we need roadmaps, not reactions.β
Or Mathias:
βItβs not whether companies want to be fair β itβs how. This gives them a blueprint.β
We donβt accept untested bridges.
We donβt accept untested medical devices.
We donβt accept untested cars.
Why have we accepted untested financial systems?
Fintech Is at a CrossroadsΒ
The intersection where fintech now stands looks like this:
AI accelerating product velocity
Fraud outpacing prevention
Trust in institutions at decade lows
Regulators preparing for a new wave of scrutiny
Consumers are increasingly financially fragile
But it also includes:
an opportunity to rebuild the financial system
new expectations around fairness
founders building with purpose
frameworks that didnβt exist until now
Fairness is no longer a branding exercise.
It is the infrastructure of future financial innovation.
The question fintech must ask in 2026 is not βhow fast can we build?β
It is: βWill people trust what weβve built?β
If the answer isnβt clear, the Playbook shows exactly where to start.
And you can listen to my full conversation with Delicia, Johnny, and Evan on the Humans of Fintech podcast here.Β

Because fintech doesnβt just move money.
It moves people.
And if we want those people to move forward β not backwards, not into harm β then this industry must finally do what every other safety-critical industry does:
Crash-test before we scale.
Fairness isnβt slowing fintech down.
Fairness is what will allow fintech to last.
Consumer Reports just told us exactly where to start.
I WANT IT, I GOT IT
π§ Todayβs Watch: Iβll be honest β I havenβt had much time to dive into a new Netflix show lately (that Warner Bros. acquisition is wild, but a story for another day). I am slowly chipping away at the final season of Stranger Things. I wasnβt sure they could pull it off, but one episode in and itβs giving me the same goosebumps it always has.
π Todayβs Read: December In Washington Flanked By A Flurry Of Crypto Policy Forums by Cleve Mesidor, Executive Director of Blockchain Foundation in Washington D.C. and also founder of the Natβl Policy Network WOC Blockchain. Cleve served in the Obama Administration and as a senior staffer in Congress, and has been a great friend and mentor to Fintech Is Femme. Following Cleveβs event, Iβm reminded of our role in continuing to push for blockchain policies for justice.
π§ββοΈTodayβs Self-Care: Last week I was also on the road β this time in Chicago to spend some much-needed time with family. Always a self-care reset. We went skiing, which, if you know me, is hilarious because I hate the cold. Iβm a beach-over-blizzard girl through and through. But somehowβ¦I upgraded to the higher slopes, leaned into the risk and adrenaline, and didnβt wipe out once. Maybe β and I canβt believe Iβm saying this β I actually like skiing?
FINTUNES
Currently, whatβs playing in my headphones. Hello throwback.

LETβS CONNECT
π° Share this newsletter with a friend and start growing your network.
π Connect with me on LinkedIn for daily insights on female leadership.
π The holidays are coming, in charge of purchasing office gifts? Grab my book, Fintech Feminists! It looks nice on the coffee table π
That wraps up todayβs editionβthanks as always for reading! Until next time, keep innovating and challenging the status quo.
See you Thursday!
Love,
Nicole π
